1 Cutting KF. Wound exudate: composition and functions. Br J Community Nurs 2003; 8(Suppl 3):S4–S9. DOI: 10.12968/bjcn.2003.8.Sup3.11577 Link, Google Scholar
2 Vowden K, Vowden P. Understanding exudate management and the role of exudate in the healing process. Br J Community Nurs 2003; 8(Suppl 5):S4–S13. DOI: 10.12968/bjcn.2003.8.Sup5.12607 Link, Google Scholar
3 World Union of Wound Healing Societies. Consensus document: Wound exudate: effective assessment and management. Wounds International. 2019. https://tinyurl.com/4xmd56kr (accessed 26 November 2024) Google Scholar
4 Nuutila K, Eriksson E. Moist wound healing with commonly available dressings. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2021; 10(12):685–698. DOI: 10.1089/wound.2020.1232 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
5 Trengove NJ, Stacey MC, Macauley S et al.. Analysis of the acute and chronic wound environments: the role of proteases and their inhibitors. Wound Repair Regen 1999; 7(6):442–452. DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-475X.1999.00442.x Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
6 Trengove NJ, Bielefeldt-Ohmann H, Stacey MC. Mitogenic activity and cytokine levels in non-healing and healing chronic leg ulcers. Wound Repair Regen 2000; 8(1):13–25. DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.2000.00013.x Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
7 Wysocki AB, Staiano-Coico L, Grinnell F. Wound fluid from chronic leg ulcers contains elevated levels of metalloproteinases MMP-2 and MMP-9. J Invest Dermatol 1993; 101(1):64–68. DOI: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12359590 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
8 Moor AN, Vachon DJ, Gould LJ. Proteolytic activity in wound fluids and tissues derived from chronic venous leg ulcers. Wound Repair Regen 2009; 17(6):832–839. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00547.x Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
9 Wysocki AB, Grinnell F. Fibronectin profiles in normal and chronic wound fluid. Lab Invest 1990; 63(6):825–831 Medline, Google Scholar
10 Yager DR, Chen SM, Ward SI. Ability of chronic wound fluids to degrade peptide growth factors is associated with increased levels of elastase activity and diminished levels of proteinase inhibitors. Wound Repair Regen 1997; 5(1):23–32. DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-475X.1997.50108.x Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
11 Palolahti M, Lauharanta J, Stephens RW et al.. Proteolytic activity in leg ulcer exudate. Exp Dermatol 1993; 2(1):29–37. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.1993.tb00196.x Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
12 Vowden P, Bond E, Meuleneire F. Managing high viscosity exudate. Wounds UK 2015; 11(1):56–60 Google Scholar
13 Dowsett C. Moisture in wound healing: exudate management. Br J Community Nurs 2011; 16(Sup6):S6–S12. DOI: 10.12968/bjcn.2011.16.Sup6.S6 Link, Google Scholar
14 Brown A. Managing exudate and maceration in venous leg ulceration within the acute health setting. Br J Nurs 2017; 26(Sup20):S18–S24. DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2017.26.Sup20.S18 Link, Google Scholar
15 Woo KY, Beeckman D, Chakravarthy D. Management of moisture-associated skin damage: a scoping review. Adv Skin Wound Care 2017; 30(11):494–501. DOI: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000525627.54569.da Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
16 Rippon MG, Rogers AA, Ousey K et al.. The importance of periwound skin in wound healing: an overview of the evidence. J Wound Care 2022; 31(8):648–659. DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2022.31.8.648 Link, Google Scholar
17 Bui UT, Edwards H, Finlayson K. Identifying risk factors associated with infection in patients with chronic leg ulcers. Int Wound J 2018; 15(2):283–290. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12867 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
18 Woo KY, Sibbald RG. A cross-sectional validation study of using NERDS and STONEES to assess bacterial burden. Ostomy Wound Manage 2009; 55(8):40–48 Medline, Google Scholar
19 Sibbald RG, Woo K, Ayello EA. Increased bacterial burden and infection: the story of NERDS and STONES. Adv Skin Wound Care 2006; 19(8):447–461. DOI: 10.1097/00129334-200610000-00012 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
20 Soares Dantas J, Silva CC, Nogueira WP et al.. Health-related quality of life predictors in people with chronic wounds. J Tissue Viability 2022; 31(4):741–745. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2022.07.017 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
21 Price P, Harding K. Cardiff Wound Impact Schedule: the development of a condition-specific questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in patients with chronic wounds of the lower limb. Int Wound J 2004; 1(1):10–17. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-481x.2004.00007.x Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
22 Phillips P, Lumley E, Duncan R et al.. A systematic review of qualitative research into people's experiences of living with venous leg ulcers. J Adv Nurs 2018; 74(3):550–563. DOI: 10.1111/jan.13465 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
23 Benbow M, Stevens J. Exudate, infection and patient quality of life. Br J Nurs 2010; 19(Sup10):S30–S36. DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2010.19.Sup10.79691 Link, Google Scholar
24 Tickle J. Wound exudate: a survey of current understanding and clinical competency. Br J Nurs 2016; 25(2):102–109. DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2016.25.2.102 Link, Google Scholar
25 Persoon A, Heinen MM, Van Der Vleuten CJ et al.. Leg ulcers: a review of their impact on daily life. J Clin Nurs 2004; 13(3):341–354. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00859.x Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
26 Jones JE, Robinson J, Barr W, Carlisle C. Impact of exudate and odour from chronic venous leg ulceration. Nurs Stand 2008; 22(45):53–61. DOI: 10.7748/ns2008.07.22.45.53.c6592 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
27 Jones J, Barr W, Robinson J, Carlisle C. Depression in patients with chronic venous ulceration. Br J Nurs 2006; 15(Sup2):S17–S23. DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2006.15.Sup2.21237 Link, Google Scholar
28 Sen CK. Human wounds and its burden: an updated compendium of estimates. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2019; 8(2):39–48. DOI: 10.1089/wound.2019.0946 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
29 Guest JF, Fuller GW, Vowden P. Cohort study evaluating the burden of wounds to the UK's National Health Service in 2017/2018: update from 2012/2013. BMJ Open 2020; 10(12):e045253. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045253 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
30 Wiegand C, Tittelbach J, Hipler U, Elsner P. Clinical efficacy of dressings for treatment of heavily exuding chronic wounds. Chronic Wound Care Management and Research 2015; 2:101–111. DOI: 10.2147/CWCMR.S60315 Crossref, Google Scholar
31 Broussard KC, Powers JG. Wound dressings: selecting the most appropriate type. Am J Clin Dermatol 2013; 14(6):449–459. DOI: 10.1007/s40257-013-0046-4 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
32 Sood A, Granick MS, Tomaselli NL. Wound dressings and comparative effectiveness data. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2014; 3(8):511–529. DOI: 10.1089/wound.2012.0401 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
33 Ousey K, Atkin L, White R. Superabsorbent wound dressings: a literature review. Wounds UK 2013;9(3):52–60 Google Scholar
34 Browning P, White RJ, Rowell T. Comparative evaluation of the functional properties of superabsorbent dressings and their effect on exudate management. J Wound Care 2016; 25(8):452–462. DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2016.25.8.452 Link, Google Scholar
35 Gefen A. Not all superabsorbent wound dressings are born equal: theory and experiments. J Wound Care 2021; 30(9):738–750. DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2021.30.9.738 Link, Google Scholar
36 NHS Clinical Evaluation Team. Clinical review: superabsorbent dressings. 2018. https://tinyurl.com/5y29tjjf (accessed 27 November 2024) Google Scholar
37 Veličković VM, Macmillan T, Lones E et al.. Systematic review and quality assessment of clinical and economic evidence for superabsorbent wound dressings in a population with chronic ulcers. Int Wound J 2024; 21(3):e14750. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14750 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
38 Norkus A, Dargis V, Thomsen JK et al.. Use of a hydrocapillary dressing in the management of highly exuding ulcers: a comparative study. J Wound Care 2005; 14(9):429–432. DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2005.14.9.26837 Link, Google Scholar
39 Probst S, Saini C, Rosset C, Skinner MB. Superabsorbent charcoal dressing versus silver foam dressing in wound area reduction: a randomised controlled trial. J Wound Care 2022; 31(2):140–146. DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2022.31.2.140 Link, Google Scholar
40 Ingham-Broomfield RB. A nurses' guide to the hierarchy of research designs and evidence. Aust J Adv Nurs 2016; 33(3):38–43. DOI: 10.37464/2016.333.1554 Crossref, Google Scholar
41 Murad MH, Asi N, Alsawas M, Alahdab F. New evidence pyramid. Evid Based Med 2016; 21(4):125–127. DOI: 10.1136/ebmed-2016-110401 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
42 Faucher N, Safar H, Baret M et al.. Superabsorbent dressings for copiously exuding wounds. Br J Nurs 2012; 21(Sup8):S22–S28. DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2012.21.Sup8.S22 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
43 Münter KC, De Lange S, Eberlein T et al.. Handling properties of a superabsorbent dressing in the management of patients with moderate-to-very high exuding wounds. J Wound Care 2018; 27(4):246–253. DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2018.27.4.246 Link, Google Scholar
44 European Committee for Standardization. Test methods for wound dressings: aspects of absorption, moisture vapour transmission, waterproofness and extensibility. EN 13726:2023. https://tinyurl.com/6ym9cf67 (accessed 27 November 2024) Google Scholar
45 Cutting KF, Westgate SJ. Super-absorbent dressings: how do they perform in vitro? Br J Nurs 2012; 21(Sup14):S14–S19. DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2012.21.Sup14.S14 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
46 O'Meara S, Cullum N, Nelson EA, Dumville JC. Compression for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 11:CD000265. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000265.pub3 Medline, Google Scholar
47 Singh G, Byrne C, Thomason H, McBain AJ. Investigating the microbial and metalloprotease sequestration properties of superabsorbent wound dressings. Sci Rep 2022; 12(1):4747. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08361-3 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
48 Lurton Y, Renard C. [Superabsorbent foam dressings: in vitro performance] [in French]. Revue Francophone de Cicatrisation 2019; 3(1):26–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.refrac.2019.01.005 Crossref, Google Scholar
49 Cook L. Effect of super-absorbent dressings on compression sub-bandage pressure. Br J Community Nurs 2011; 16(Sup3):S38–S43. DOI: 10.12968/bjcn.2011.16.Sup3.S38 Link, Google Scholar
50 Cutting KF. Super-absorbent polymer dressings and sub-bandage pressure: a concern? Br J Nurs 2014; 23(Sup6):S12. DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2014.23.Sup6.S12 Link, Google Scholar
51 Management of highly exuding leg ulcers: a focus on Mextra Superabsorbent dressing. Wounds International 2021. https://tinyurl.com/3528ejds (accessed 27 November 2024) Google Scholar
52 Anthony D, Rafter L, Collier M, Rafter M. Stopping the strikethrough: an audit of patient outcomes on four superabsorbent dressings. Wounds UK 2015; 11(4):60–67 Google Scholar
53 Elstone A, White R. Multilayering of superabsorbent polymer dressings has no place in wound care. Br J Community Nurs 2015; 20(Sup9):S6–S6. DOI: 10.12968/bjcn.2015.20.Sup9.S6 Link, Google Scholar
54 Lustig A, Gefen A. The performance of gelling fibre wound dressings under clinically relevant robotic laboratory tests. Int Wound J 2022; 19(Suppl 1):3–21. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13761 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
55 Chakravarthy D, Rodway N, Schmidt S et al.. Evaluation of three new hydrocolloid dressings: Retention of dressing integrity and biodegradability of absorbent components attenuate inflammation. J Biomed Mater Res 1994; 28(10):1165–1173. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820281007 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
56 Wood RA. Disintegration of cellulose dressings in open granulating wounds. BMJ 1976; 1(6023):1444–1445. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.1.6023.1444-a Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
57 Bowler PG, Duerden BI, Armstrong DG. Wound microbiology and associated approaches to wound management. Clin Microbiol Rev 2001; 14(2):244–269. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.14.2.244-269.2001 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
58 Bowler PG. Wound pathophysiology, infection and therapeutic options. Ann Med 2002; 34(6):419–427. DOI: 10.1080/078538902321012360 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
59 Wiegand C, Abel M, Ruth P, Hipler UC. Superabsorbent polymer-containing wound dressings have a beneficial effect on wound healing by reducing PMN elastase concentration and inhibiting microbial growth. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2011; 22(11):2583–2590. DOI: 10.1007/s10856-011-4423-3 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
60 Wiegand C, Abel M, Muldoon J et al.. SAP-containing dressings exhibit sustained antimicrobial effects over 7 days in vitro. J Wound Care 2013; 22(3):120–127. DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2013.22.3.120 Link, Google Scholar
61 Larkö E, Persson A, Blom K. Effect of superabsorbent dressings in a 3D acellular tissue model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm. J Wound Care 2015; 24(5):204–210. DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2015.24.5.204 Link, Google Scholar
62 Westgate S, Cutting K. Using hydration response technology dressings in bacteria management. Wounds UK 2012; 8(3):68–73 Google Scholar
63 Stanirowski PJ, Bizoń M, Cendrowski K, Sawicki W. Randomized controlled trial evaluating dialkylcarbamoyl chloride impregnated dressings for the prevention of surgical site infections in adult women undergoing cesarean section. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2016; 17(4):427–435. DOI: 10.1089/sur.2015.223 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
64 McCarty SM, Percival SL. Proteases and delayed wound healing. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2013; 2(8):438–447. DOI: 10.1089/wound.2012.0370 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
65 Westby MJ, Norman G, Watson RE et al.. Protease activity as a prognostic factor for wound healing in complex wounds. Wound Repair Regen 2020; 28(5):631–644. DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12835 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
66 Wiegand C, Hipler UC. A superabsorbent polymer-containing wound dressing efficiently sequesters MMPs and inhibits collagenase activity in vitro. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2013; 24(10):2473–2478. DOI: 10.1007/s10856-013-4990-6 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
67 Humbert P, Courderot-Masuyer C, Robin S et al.. Exudates absorption and proteases trapping in venous leg ulcers. J Wound Care 2017; 26(6):346–348. DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.6.346 Link, Google Scholar
68 Wiegand C, White RJ. Binding and inhibition of protease enzymes, including MMPs, by a superabsorbent dressing in vitro. J Wound Care 2013; 22(5):221–229. DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2013.22.5.221 Link, Google Scholar
69 Wiegand C, Hipler UC. In vitro studies on the beneficial effect of a hydrokinetic fiber dressing on wound healing by reduction of protease activity. J Wound Care 2013; 22(11):592 Medline, Google Scholar
70 Eming S, Smola H, Hartmann B et al.. The inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase activity in chronic wounds by a polyacrylate superabsorber. Biomaterials 2008; 29(19):2932–2940. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.029 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
71 Tarlton JF, Munro HS. Use of modified superabsorbent polymer dressings for protease modulation in improved chronic wound care. Wounds 2013; 25(2):51–57 Medline, Google Scholar
72 Atkin L, Barrett S, Chadwick P et al.. Evaluation of a superabsorbent wound dressing, patient and clinician perspective: a case series. J Wound Care 2020; 29(3):174–182. DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2020.29.3.174 Link, Google Scholar
73 Barrett S, Callaghan R, Chadwick P et al.. An observational study of a superabsorbent polymer dressing evaluated by clinicians and patients. J Wound Care 2018; 27(2):91–100. DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2018.27.2.91 Link, Google Scholar
74 Walzer S, Dröschel D, Vollmer L et al.. A cost-effectiveness analysis of a hydration response technology dressing in the treatment of venous leg ulcers in the UK. J Wound Care 2018; 27(3):166–172. DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2018.27.3.166 Link, Google Scholar
75 Hermans MH, Kwon Lee S, Ragan MR, Laudi P. Results of a retrospective comparative study: material cost for managing a series of large wounds in subjects with serious morbidity with a hydrokinetic fiber dressing or negative pressure wound therapy. Wounds 2015; 27(3):73–82 Medline, Google Scholar
76 Veličković VM, Chadwick P, Rippon MG et al.. Cost-effectiveness of superabsorbent wound dressing versus standard of care in patients with moderate-to-highly exuding leg ulcers. J Wound Care 2020; 29(4):235–246. DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2020.29.4.235 Link, Google Scholar
77 Veličković VM, Szilcz M, Milošević Z et al.. Cost-effectiveness analysis of superabsorbent wound dressings in patients with moderate-to-highly exuding leg ulcers in Germany. Int Wound J 2022; 19(2):447–459. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13645 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
78 Veličković VM, Prieto PA, Krga M, Jorge AM. Superabsorbent wound dressings versus foams dressings for the management of moderate-to-highly exuding venous leg ulcers in French settings: an early stage model-based economic evaluation. J Tissue Viability 2022; 31(3):523–530. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2022.04.005 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar

2 January 2025Volume 34Issue 1

ISSN (print): 0969-0700
ISSN (online): 2052-2916

Metrics

History

Published online 11 January 2025

Published in print 2 January 2025

Information

Keywords

PDF download