This website is intended for healthcare professionals

Negative pressure wound therapy in the early period after hand and forearm replantation, is it safe?

    Abstract

    Objective:

    In this study, effectiveness and reliability of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in the early period after replantation will be examined retrospectively in a series of patients.

    Method:

    Patients who underwent replantation between 2007 and 2014, and had tissue defect or partial necrosis in the absence of a major circulation problem were included in this retrospective study. Following debridement of necrotic tissues on the postoperative 7–10 days, NPWT was applied to all patients one day later and adjusted as intermittent 75 mmHg pressure. Intermittent phase adjustment was arranged as 5 minutes suction and 2 minutes resting, and resting pressure was adjusted as 35 mmHg. NPWT was applied for six days and dressings were changed in every three days in the first six day period. Open wounds was debrided again and grafted with split-thickness skin graft and NPWT was continued over the graft for 4 days more.

    Results:

    There were 11 patients included of which nine amputations were complete and two were nearly total amputations of forearm. Granulation tissue was observed following 6 days of NPWT application in all patients. Graft survival was observed to be almost complete. Wound infection did not occur and tissue cultures obtained in the course of debridement were all negative. Partial oxygen saturations were between 96–99% during the NPWT.

    Conclusion:

    NPWT (75 mmHg) can be used in the intermittent mode in order to improve wound healing and shorten the period to start physical therapy in the early period after replantation and revascularisation.

    Declaration of interest

    The authors have no conflict of interest.

    References

    • 1 Durusoy, R., Davas, A., Kayalar, M. et al. What kinds of hand injuries are more likely to result in amputation? An analysis of 6549 hand injuries. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2011; 36: 5, 383–391. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 2 Sabapathy, S.R., Venkatramani, H., Bharathi, R.R., Bhardwaj, P. Replantation surgery. J Hand Surg Am 2011; 36: 6, 1104–1110. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 3 Zhou, M., Qi, B., Yu, A. et al. Vacuum assisted closure therapy for treatment of complex wounds in replanted extremities. Mıcrosurgery 2013; 33: 8, 620–624. MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 4 Moues. C.M., Heule, F., Hovius, S.E. A review of topical negative pressure therapy in wound healing: sufficient evidence? Am J Surg 2011; 201: 4, 544–556. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 5 Orgill, D.P, Bayer, L.R. Negative pressure wound therapy: past, present and future. Int Wound J. 2013; 10 Suppl 1: 15–19. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 6 Wood, B.C., Molnar, J.A. Subatmospheric pressure therapy: basic science review. J Surg Orthop Adv 2011; 20: 3, 168–175. MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 7 Fleischmann, W., Becker, U., Bischoff, M., Hoekstra, H. Vacuum sealing: indication, technique, and results. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 1995; 5: 1, 37–40. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 8 Genecov, D.G., Schneider, A.M., Morykwas, M.J. et al. A controlled subatmospheric pressure dressing increases the rate of skin graft donor site reepithelialization. Ann Plast Surg 1998; 40: 3, 219–225. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 9 Chen, S.Z, Li, J., Li, X.Y., Xu, L.S. Effects of vacuum-assisted closure on wound microcirculation: an experimental study. Asian J Surg 2005; 28: 3, 211–217. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 10 Morykwas, M.J., Argenta, L.C., Shelton-Brown, E.I., McGuirt, W. Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: animal studies and basic foundation. Ann Plast Surg 1997; 38: 6, 553–562. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 11 Wackenfors, A., Sjogren, J., Gustafsson, R., et al. Effects of vacuumassisted closure therapy on inguinal wound edge microvascular blood flow. Wound Repair Regen 2004; 12: 6, 600–606. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 12 Wackenfors, A., Gustafsson, R., Sjogren, J. et al. Blood flow responses in the peristernal thoracic wall during vacuum-assisted closure therapy. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79: 5, 1724–1730 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 13 Dadaci M, Ince B, Arslan A. Comments on “Vacuum assisted closure therapy for treatment of complex wounds in replanted extremities”. Microsurgery 2014; 34: 6, 503–504. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 14 Lioupis, C., Kotsis, T., Barbatis, C. et al. The effect of negative pressure therapy on the femoral vein blood flow and wall structure. Angiology 2009; 60: 3, 290–300. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 15 Negosanti, L., Sgarzani, R., Nejad, P. et al. VAC therapy for wound management in patients with contraindications to surgical treatment. Dermatol Ther 2012; 25: 3, 277–280. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 16 Scherer, S.S., Pietramaggiori, G., Mathews, J.C. et al. The mechanism of action of the vacuum-assisted closure device. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122: 786–797. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 17 Patwa, J.J., Krishnan, A. Buerger's Disease (Thromboangiitis Obliterans)-Management by Ilizarov's Technique of Horizontal Distraction. A Retrospective Study of 60 Cases. Indian J Surg 2011; 73: 1, 40–47. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 18 Vegfors, M., Tryggvason, B., Sjöberg, F., Lennmarken, C. Assesment of peripheral blood flow using a pulse oximeter. J Clin Monit 1990; 6: 1, 1–4. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 19 Graham, -B., Paulus, D.A., Caffee, H.H. Pulse oximetry for vascular monitoring in upper extremity replantation surgery. J Hand Surg Am 1986; 11: 5, 687–692. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 20 Kairinos, N., Solomons, M., Hudson, D.A. Negative-pressure wound therapy I: the paradox of negative-pressure wound therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123: 2, 589–598. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 21 Kairinos, N., Voogd, A.M., Botha, P.H. et al. Negative-pressure wound therapy. II: negative-pressure wound therapy and increased perfusion. Just an illusion? Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123: 2, 601–612. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 22 Kamolz, L.P., Andel, H., Haslik, W. et al. Use of subatmospheric pressure therapy to prevent burn wound progression in human: first experiences. Burns 2004; 30: 3, 253–258. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 23 Simman, R., Forte, R., Silverberg, R. et al. A comparative histological pilot study of skin graft take with tie-over bolster dressing versus vacuum assisted closure in a pig model. Wounds 2004; 16: 2, 76–80. Google Scholar

    This website is intended for healthcare professionals