This website is intended for healthcare professionals

Negative pressure wound therapy: improving the patient experience Part 3 of 3

    Abstract

    Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is considered to be an effective wound treatment, yet research has highlighted a clear need for its improvement, particularly in reducing pain. This is important not only for patient well-being and treatment satisfaction but also for the healing process. In parts 1 and 2, wound care clinicians were invited to share their views on patients’ experiences of NPWT. Part 3, presented here, explores the views of patients who have had NPWT, through use of a questionnaire survey and interview (n = 50). Findings show that the majority of patients felt that NPWT had a positive impact on their wound (94%) and that their overall experience was positive (88%). However, respondents identified a number of challenges associated with NPWT, such as reduced mobility, noise issues, and sleep disturbance. Respondents also identified a number of areas for improvement with NPWT, including greater training for nurses, practical alterations to the equipment, and methods of minimising pain and skin damage during NPWT. Taken together with the findings from part one and two, this study highlights several key considerations for future research and clinical practice with NPWT.

    References

    • 1 Wu, S.C., Armstrong, D.G. Clinical outcomes of diabetic foot ulcers treated with negative pressure wound therapy and the transition from acute care to home care. Int Wound J 2008; 5: (Suppl 2), 10–16. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 2 Abbotts, J. Patients’ views on topical negative pressure: ‘effective but smelly.’ Br J Nurs 2010; 19: 20, S37–41. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 3 Morykwas, M.J., Simpson, J., Punger, K. et al. Vacuum-assisted closure: state of basic research and physiologic foundation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117: 7, S121–126. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 4 Upton, D., Stephens, D., Andrews, A. Patients’ experiences of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for the treatment of wounds: a review. J Wound Care 2013; 22: 1, 34–39. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 5 Schimp, V.L., Worley, C., Brunello, S. et al.. Vacuum-assisted closure in the treatment of gynecologic oncology wound failures. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 92: 2, 586–591. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 6 Woo, K. Wound-related pain: anxiety stress and wound healing. Wounds UK 2010; 6: 4, 92–98. Google Scholar
    • 7 Upton, D., Solowiej, K. Pain and stress as contributors to delayed wound healing. Wound Prac Res 2010; 18: 3, 114–122. Google Scholar
    • 8 Salome, G.M., Pellegrino, M.P.D., Vieira, T.F. et al.. Sleep quality among patients with venous ulcers: A cross-sectional study in a health care setting in São Paulo, Brazil. Wounds 2012; 24: 5, 124–131. MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 9 Upton, D., Andrews, A. Sleep disruption in patients with chronic leg ulcers. J Wound Care 2013; 22: 8, 389–394. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 10 Price, P.E., Fagervik-Morton, H., Mudge, E.J. et al. Dressing-related pain in patients with chronic wounds: an international patient perspective. Int Wound J 2008; 5: 2, 159–171. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 11 Upton, D., Richardson, C., Van Acker, K., et al. Diabetic Foot Study Group: Diabetes, pain, and the consequences. Diab Foot J 2013; 16: 1, 36–39. Google Scholar
    • 12 Stone, A.M., Lammers, J.C. The uncertainty room: strategies for managing uncertainty in a surgical waiting room. Perm J 2012; 16: 4, 27–30. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 13 Flory, N., Lang, E.V. Distress in the radiology waiting room. Radiology 2011; 260: 1, 166–173. Google Scholar

    This website is intended for healthcare professionals