This website is intended for healthcare professionals

Skip main navigation
Search
Quick Search in Books
Quick Search anywhere
Quick Search in Journals
Quick Search in Journals
Quick Search in Journals
Quick Search in Journals
Quick Search in Journals
Quick Search in Journals
Quick Search in Journals
Quick Search in Journals
Quick Search in Journals
Advanced Search
education

Patients' experiences of negative pressure wound therapy for the treatment of wounds: a review

    Published Online:16 Aug 2013https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2013.22.1.34

    Abstract

    Objective:

    To review the research on patients' experiences of undergoing negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT).

    Method:

    A literature search was carried out using the following databases: Academic Search Complete, CINAHL, PsychINFO, MEDLINE, PubMed and PsyARTICLES. The search covered the period from 2001 to 2012, using the key words: [‘negative pressure wound therapy’ OR ‘vacuum-assisted closure’ OR ‘topical negative therapy’] AND [‘patients' experiences’ OR ‘psychological’ OR ‘stress’ OR ‘anxiety’ OR ‘wellbeing’ OR ‘pain’ OR ‘quality of life’ OR ‘physical’].

    Results:

    Twenty-five relevant articles were included. NPWT is generally considered to be successful in reducing wound depth and facilitating healing. However, studies have highlighted a number of issues that need to be considered. For example, the type of dressing used during treatment can have a significant effect on patients' experience of pain. Furthermore, the NPWT system can cause patients to feel anxious due to both the patient and the health professional being unfamiliar with this form of treatment. It can also restrict patients' daily care and wider social life, which may result in a negative self-image and low self-esteem. Despite this, some studies have reported positive improvements to patients' quality of life. Additionally, since NPWT can lead to faster healing, any detrimental impact upon patients' wellbeing may be short-term and less prolonged than that of other treatments.

    Conclusion:

    Compared with other treatments, there is evidence to show that NPWT can lead to faster wound healing, and a reduced frequency of dressing changes and other treatments. However, there are a number of challenges with the use of NPWT, which need to be explored further so that improvements can be made. Specifically, certain aspects of NPWT may impact negatively on patients' wellbeing, albeit short-term. Therefore, research needs to explore patients' experiences of NPWT throughout the treatment process and to consider how this can be improved to minimise any negative effects.

    Declaration of interest:

    There were no external sources of funding for this study. The authors have no commercial or financial conflicts of interest to declare.

    References

    • 1 Ubbink, D.T., Westerbos, S.J., Evans, D.et al.. Topical negative pressure for treating chronic wounds. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008; 16: 3, CD001898. Google Scholar
    • 2 Panicker, V.N. A pilot study evaluating topical negative pressure using V1STA technology. Wound Pract Res. 2009; 17: 194–200. Google Scholar
    • 3 Dowsett, C. Recommendations for the use of negative pressure wound therapy. Wounds UK. 2012; 8: 48–59. Google Scholar
    • 4 Wu, S.C., Armstrong, D.G. Clinical outcomes of diabetic foot ulcers treated with negative pressure wound therapy and the transition from acute care to home care. Int Wound J. 2008; 5: 10–16. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 5 Abbotts, J. Patients' views on topical negative pressure: ‘effective but smelly’. Br J Nurs. 2010; 19: 20, S37–41. Link, Google Scholar
    • 6 Morykwas, M.J., Simpson, J., Punger, K.et al.. Vacuum-assisted closure: state of basic research and physiologic foundation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 117: 7, S121–126. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 7 Woo, K.Y., Sibbald, G. Vacuum-assisted closure home care training: a process to link education to improved patient outcomes. Int Wound J. 2008; 5 (Suppl. 2): 1–9. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 8 Flack, S., Apelqvist, J., Keith, M.et al.. An economic evaluation of VAC therapy compared with wound dressings in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. J Wound Care. 2008; 17: 71–78. Link, Google Scholar
    • 9 Mendonca, D.A., Papini, R., Price, P.E. Negative-pressure wound therapy: a snapshot of the evidence. Int Wound J. 2006; 3: 261–271. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 10 Upton, D., Solowiej, K., Hender, C., Woo, K.Y. Stress and pain associated with dressing change in patients with chronic wounds. J Wound Care. 2012; 21: 53–61. Link, Google Scholar
    • 11 Krasner, D.L. Managing wound pain in patients with vacuum-assisted closure devices. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2002; 48: 5, 38–43. Medline, Google Scholar
    • 12 Vuolo, J.C. Wound related pain: key sources and triggers. Br J Nurs. 2009; 18: 5, S20–22. Link, Google Scholar
    • 13 Keskin, M., Karabekmez, F.E., Yilmaz, E. Vacuum-assisted closure of wounds and anxiety. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2008; 42: 202–205. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 14 Price, P., Harding, K. Cardiff Wound Impact Schedule: the development of a condition-specific questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in patients with chronic wounds of the lower limb. Int Wound J. 2004; 1: 10–17. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 15 Persoon, A., Heinen, M.M., van der Vleuten, C.J.et al.. Leg ulcers: a review of their impact on daily life. J Clin Nurs. 2004; 13: 341–354. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 16 Stansby, G., Wealleans, V., Wilson, L., Morrow, D. Clinical experience of a new NPWT system in diabetic foot ulcers and post-amputation wounds. J Wound Care. 2010; 19: 496–502. Link, Google Scholar
    • 17 Augustin, M., Zschocke, I. Patient evaluation of the benefit of outpatient and inpatient vacuum therapy. Multicenter study with patient-relevant end points. MMW-Fortschritte der Medizin Originalia. 2006; 148: 25–32. Google Scholar
    • 18 Schimp, V.L., Worley, C.,Brunello, S.et al.. Vacuum-assisted closure in the treatment of gynecologic oncology wound failures. Gynecol Oncol. 2003; 92: 586–591. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 19 Apostoli, A., Caula, C. Pain and basic functional activities in a group of patients with cutaneous wounds under V.A.C. therapy in hospital setting [in Italian]. Prof Inferm. 2008; 61: 158–164. Medline, Google Scholar
    • 20 Hurd, T., Chadwick, P., Cote, J.et al.. Impact of gauze-based NPWT on the patient and nursing experience in the treatment of challenging wounds. Int Wound J. 2010; 7: 448–455. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 21 Chariker, M.E., Jeter, K.F., Tintle, T.E., Bottsford, J.E. Effective management of incisional and cutaneous fistula with closed suction wound drainage. Contemp Surg. 1989; 34: 59–63. Google Scholar
    • 22 Fraccalvieri, M., Ruka, E., Bocchiotti, M.A.et al.. Patient's pain feedback using negative pressure wound therapy with foam and gauze. Int Wound J. 2011; 8: 492–499. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 23 Teot, L., Lambert, L., Ourabah, Z.et al.. Use of topical negative pressure with a lipidocolloid dressing: results of a clinical evaluation. J Wound Care. 2006; 15: 355–358. Link, Google Scholar
    • 24 Wolvos, T. Wound instillation — the next step in negative pressure wound therapy. Lessons learned from initial experiences. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2004; 50: 11, 56–66. Medline, Google Scholar
    • 25 Verbelen, J., Hoeksema, H., Heyneman, A.et al... Treatment of Fournier's gangrene with a novel negative pressure wound therapy system. Wounds. 2011; 23: 342–349. Medline, Google Scholar
    • 26 Nease, C. Using low pressure, negative pressure wound therapy for wound preparation and the management of split-thickness skin grafts in three patients with complex wounds. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2009; 55: 6, 32–42. Medline, Google Scholar
    • 27 Hamilton, M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. Br J Med Psychol. 1959; 32: 50–55. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 28 Spielberger, C.D., Gorsuch, R.L., Lushene, R,E. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Consulting Psychologist Press, 1983. Google Scholar
    • 29 Assenza, M., Cozza, V., Sacco, E.et al.. VAC (Vacuum Assisted Closure) treatment in Fournier's gangrene: personal experience and literature review. Clin Ter. 2011; 162: e1–5. Medline, Google Scholar
    • 30 Bryan, S., Dukes, S. Case study: negative pressure wound therapy in an abdominal wound. Br J Nurs. 2009; 18: 6, S15–S21. Link, Google Scholar
    • 31 Ozturk, E., Ozguc, H., Yilmazlar, T. The use of vacuum assisted closure therapy in the management of Fournier's gangrene. Am J Surg. 2009; 197: 660–665. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 32 Wondburg, D., Larusson, H.J., Metzger, U.et al.. Treatment of the open abdomen with the commercially available vacuum-assisted closure system in patients with abdominal sepsis. World J Surg. 2008; 32: 2724–2729. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 33 Ware, J.E. Jnr, Sherbourne, C.D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992; 30: 473–483. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 34 Mendonca, D.A., Drew, P.J., Harding, K.G., Price, P.E. A pilot study on the effect of topical negative pressure on quality of life. J Wound Care. 2007; 16: 49–53. Link, Google Scholar
    • 35 Ousey, K.J., Milne, J., Cook, L.et al.. A pilot study exploring quality of life experienced by patients undergoing negative pressure wound therapy as part of their wound care treatment compared to patients receiving standard wound care. Int Wound J. 2012; [pub ahead of print]. Google Scholar
    • 36 Wallin, A-M., Boström, L., Ulfvarson, J., Ottosson, C. Negative pressure wound therapy — a descriptive study. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2001; 57: 6, 22–29. Google Scholar
    • 37 Karatepe, O., Eken. I., Acet, E.et al.. Vacuum assisted closure improves the quality of life in patients with diabetic foot. Acta Chir Belg. 2011; 111: 298–302. Medline, Google Scholar
    • 38 Ford-Dunn, S. Use of vacuum assisted closure therapy in the palliation of a malignant wound. Palliat Med. 2006; 20: 477–478. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 39 Vuerstaek, J.D., Vainas, T., Wuite, J.et al... State-of-the-art treatment of chronic leg ulcers: a randomized controlled trial comparing vacuum-assisted closure (V.A.C.) with modern wound dressings. J Vasc Surg. 2006; 44: 1029–1037. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 40 Bolas, N., Holloway, S. Negative pressure wound therapy: a study on patient perspectives. Br J Comm Nurs. 2012; 17: 3 (Suppl.), S30–35. Link, Google Scholar
    • 41 Moffatt, C.J., Mapplebeck, L., Murray, S., Morgan, P.A. The experience of patients with complex wounds and the use of NPWT in a home-care setting. J Wound Care. 2011; 20: 512–517. Link, Google Scholar

    This website is intended for healthcare professionals