Education

Taking the trauma out of wound care: the importance of undisturbed healing

M. Rippon

1Mölnlycke Health Care, Gothenburg, Sweden;

Search for more papers by this author

P. Davies

1Mölnlycke Health Care, Gothenburg, Sweden;

Search for more papers by this author

R. White

2Institute of Health, Social Care and Psychology, University of Worcester, UK.

Search for more papers by this author

Published Online:16 Aug 2013https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2012.21.8.359

View article

Abstract

Significant advances in wound dressing technology have resulted in a myriad of dressing choices for wound-care clinicians, providing more than just an inert wound cover. The establishment of a moist wound environment under modern wound dressings and the optimisation of the healing response are now the goals expected of these dressings. However, the use of wound dressings, particularly traditional dressings such as gauze, frequently results in wound and peri-wound tissue damage that impairs the wound healing response, counteracting any of the dressings' healing benefits. Therefore, in order to maximise the healing benefits wounds covered by today's wound dressings must minimise tissue disturbance (physical as well as chemical). This review aims to consider the ways traditional, as well as modern, wound dressings may disturb wounds, summarising the potential areas of wound disturbance, and suggesting how best to address this aspect of the use of wound dressings to treat acute as well as chronic wounds.

References

1 Cutting, K.F. Wound dressings: 21st century performance requirements. J Wound Care. 2010; 19: 5 (suppl.), 4–9. Link, Google Scholar
2 Turner, T.D. Semi-occlusive and occlusive dressings. In: Ryan, t.J. (ed). An Environment for Healing: the Role of occlusion. Royal society of Medicine, 1985. Google Scholar
3 Ubbink, D.T., Vermeulen, H., Goossens, A. et al. Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Surg. 2008; 143: 10, 950–955. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
4 Thomas, S. The role of dressings in the treatment of moisture-related skin damage. World Wide Wounds, 2008. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/65d25x [Accessed July 2012]. Google Scholar
5 Snyder, R.J. Managing dead space: an overview — eliminating these unwanted areas is a key to successful wound healing. Podiatry Manage. 2005; 24: 8, 171–174. Google Scholar
6 White, R. Wound dressings and other topical treatment modalities in bioburden control. In: Percival, s., Cutting, K. (eds). Microbiology of Wounds. CRC Press, 2009. Google Scholar
7 White, R. Wound dressings and other topical treatment modalities in bioburden control. J Wound Care. 2011; 20: 9, 431–439. Link, Google Scholar
8 Jones, S.A., Bowler, P.G., Walker, M. Antimicrobial activity of silver-containing dressings is influenced by dressing conformability with a wound surface. Wounds. 2005; 17: 9, 263–270. Google Scholar
9 Bowler, P., Jones, s., towers, v. et al. Dressing conformability and silver-containing wound dressings. Wounds UK. 2010; 6: 2, 14–20 Google Scholar
10 Walker, M, lam, s., Pritchard, D. et al. Biophysical properties of a Hydrofiber cover dressing. Wounds UK. 2010; 6: 1, 16–29. Google Scholar
11 Waring, M., Butcher, M. An investigation into the conformability of wound dressings. Wounds UK. 2011; 7: 3, 14–24. Google Scholar
12 Waring, M., Bielfeldt, s., Mätzold, K. et al. An evaluation of the skin stripping of wound dressing adhesives. J Wound Care. 2011; 20: 9, 412–422. Link, Google Scholar
13 Benbow, M. Exploring the concept of moist wound healing and its application in practice. Br J Nurs. 2008; 17: 15, S4–S8. Link, Google Scholar
14 Winter, G.D. Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelialisation of superficial wounds in the skin of a young domestic pig. Nature. 1962; 193: 293–294. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
15 Winter, G.D., scales, J.T. Effect of air drying and dressings on the surface of a wound. Nature. 1963; 197: 91–92. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
16 Nemeth, A.J., Eaglstein, W.H., Taylor, J.R. et al. Faster healing and less pain in skin biopsy sites treated with an occlusive dressing. Arch Dermatol. 1991; 127: 11, 1679–1683. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
17 Ågren, M.S, Karlsmark, t., Hansen, J.B. et al. occlusion versus air exposure on full-thickness biopsy wounds. J Wound Care. 2001; 10: 8, 301–304. Link, Google Scholar
18 Korting, H.C., Shöllmann, C., White, R.J. Management of minor acute cutaneous wounds: importance of wound healing in a moist environment. J Eur Acad Dermatol Vnereol. 2011; 25: 2, 130–137. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
19 Bishop, S.M., Walker, M., Rogers, A.A. et al. Importance of moisture balance at the wound-dressing interface. J Wound Care. 2003; 12: 4, 125–128. Link, Google Scholar
20 Schulz, G., Stechmiller, J. Wound healing and nitric oxide production: too little or too much may impair healing and cause chronic wounds. Int J low Extrem Wounds. 2006; 5: 6, 6–8. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
21 Ratliff, C.R. Wound exudate: an influential factor in healing. Adv nurse Pract. 2008; 16: 7, 32–35. Medline, Google Scholar
22 Dowsett, C. Exudate management: a patient-centred approach. J Wound Care. 2008; 17: 6, 249–252. Link, Google Scholar
23 Okan, D., Woo, K., Ayello, E.A., Sibbald, g. the role of moisture balance in wound healing. Adv skin Wound Care. 2007; 20: 1, 39–53. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
24 Bolton, l. operational definition of moist wound healing. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2007; 34:1,23–29. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
25 Jones,J.Winter's concept of moist wound healing: a review of the evidence and impact on clinical practice.J Wound Care.2005;14:6,273–276. Link, Google Scholar
26 Flanagan,M.The physiology of wound healing.J Wound Care.2000;9:6,299–300. Link, Google Scholar
27 Parks,W.C.The production, role and regulation of matrix metalloproteinases in the healing epidermis. Wounds. 1995; 7: (suppl. A), 23A–37A. Google Scholar
28 Gill,S.E.,Parks,W.C.Metalloproteinases and their inhibitors: regulators of wound healing. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2008; 40: 6–7, 1334–1347. Google Scholar
29 Madden,M.R.,Nolan,E.,Finkelstein,J.L.et al.Comparison of an occlusive and a semi-occlusive dressing and the effect of the wound exudate upon keratinocyte proliferation.J Trauma.1989;27:9,924–930. Crossref, Google Scholar
30 Andrews,K.D.,Hunt,J.A.Upregulation of matrix and adhesion molecules induced by controlled topography.J Mater Sci Mater Med.2008;19:4,1601–1608. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
31 Chen,M.,Patra,P.K.,Warner,S.B.et al.Role of fibre diameter in adhesion and proliferation of NIH 3T3 fibroblast on electrospun polycaprolactone scaffolds.Tissue Eng.2007;13:3,579–587. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
32 Chen,M.,Patra,P.K.,Lovett,M.L.et al.Role of electrospun fibre diameter and corresponding specific surface area (SSA) on cell attachment.J Tissue Eng Regen Med.2009;3:4,269–279. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
33 Rogers,A.A.,Walmsley,R.S.,Rippon,M.G.et al.Adsorption of serum-derived proteins by primary dressings: implications for dressing adhesion to wounds.J Wound Care.1999;8:8,403–406. Link, Google Scholar
34 Cochrane,C.,Rippon,M.G.,Rogers,A.et al.Application of anin vitromodel to evaluate bioadhesion of fibroblasts and epithelial cells to two different dressings.Biomaterials.1999;20:13,1237–1244. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
35 Campillo-Fernández,A.J.,Unger,R.E.,Peters,K.et al.Analysis of the biological response of endothelial and fibroblast cells cultured on synthetic scaffolds with various hydrophilic/hydrophobic ratios: influence of fibronectin adsorption and conformation.Tissue Eng Part A.2009;15:6,1331–1341. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
36 Borgquist,O.,Gustafsson,L.,Ingemansson,R.et al.tissue ingrowth into foam but not into gauze during negative pressure wound therapy.Wounds.2009;21:11,302–309. Medline, Google Scholar
37 Borgquist,O.,Gustafsson,L.,Ingemansson,R.et al.Micro- and macromechanical effects on the wound bed of negative pressure wound therapy using gauze and foam.Ann Plast Surg.2010;64:6,789–793. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
38 Morykwas, M. Sub atmospheric pressure therapy: research evidence. First International topical negative Pressure therapy ETRs Focus group Meeting. ETRs, 2003. Google Scholar
39 Campbell,P.E.,Smith,G.S.,smith,J.M.Retrospective clinical evaluation of gauze-based negative pressure wound therapy.Int Wound J.2008;5:2,280–286. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
40 Xu,X.,Lau,K.,Taira,B.R.et al.the current management of skin tears.Am J Emerg Med.2009;27:6,729–733. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
41 White,R.A multinational survey of the assessment of pain when removing dressings.Wounds UK.2008;4:1,14–22. Google Scholar
42 Hollinworth, H., Collier, M. nurses' views about pain and trauma at dressing changes: results of a national survey. J Wound Care. 2000; 9: 8, 369–373. Link, Google Scholar
43 Kammerlander, G., Eberlein, T. nurses' views about pain and trauma at dressing changes: a central European perspective. J Wound Care. 2002; 11:2, 76–79. Link, Google Scholar
44 Chapman,C.R.,Tuckett,R.P.,song,C.W.Pain and stress in a systems perspective: reciprocal neural, endocrine, and immune interactions. J Pain 2008; 9: 2, 122–145. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
45 Solowiej,K.,Mason,V.,Upton,D.Review of the relationship between stress and wound healing: part 1.J Wound Care.2009;18:9,357–366. Link, Google Scholar
46 Woo,K.Wound-related pain: anxiety, stress and wound healing.Wounds UK.2010;6:4,92–98. Google Scholar
47 Cutting,K.F.,White,R.J.Maceration of the skin and wound bed. 1: Its nature and causes.J Wound Care.2002;11:7,275–278. Link, Google Scholar
48 Cutting, K.F. the causes and prevention of maceration of the skin. J Wound Care. 1999; 8: 4, 200–201 Link, Google Scholar
49 Chen,W.Y.,Rogers,A.A.Recent insights into the causes of chronic leg ulceration in venous diseases and implications on other types of chronic wounds.Wound Repair Regen.2007;15:4,434–449. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
50 Rippon, M., White, R., Davies, P. skin adhesives and their role in wound dressings. Wounds UK. 2007; 3: 4, 76–86. Google Scholar
51 Cutting,K.F.Impact of adhesive surgical tape and wound dressings on the skin, with reference to skin stripping.J Wound Care.2008;17:4,157–162. Link, Google Scholar
52 White,R.Evidence for atraumatic soft silicone wound dressing use.Wounds UK.2005;1:3,104–109. Google Scholar
53 Morris,C.Blisters: identification and treatment in wound care.Wound Essentials.2008;3:125–127. Google Scholar
54 Butcher, M., Thompson, g. Dressings can prevent pressure ulcers: fact or fallacy? The problem of pressure ulcer prevention. Wounds UK. 2009; 5: 4, 80–93. Google Scholar
55 Wong,V.W.,Akaishi,S.,Longaker,M.T.et al.Pushing back: wound mechanotransduction in repair and regeneration.J Invest Dermatol.2011;131:11,2186–2196. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
56 Wong,V.W.,Paterno,J.,Sorkin,M.et al.Mechanical force prolongs acute inflammation via t-cell-dependent pathways during scar formation. FASEB J. 2011; 25: 12, 4498–4510 Google Scholar
57 Jung Y, son D, Kwon s, Kim J, Han K. Experimental pig model of clinically relevant wound healing delay by intrinsic factors. Int Wound J. 2012. [Epub ahead of print]. Medline, Google Scholar
58 Leek, M.D., Barlow, Y.M. tissue reactions induced by hydrocolloid wound dressings. J Anat. 1992; 180: 3, 545–551. Google Scholar
59 Chakravarthy,D.,Rodway,N.,Schmidt,S.et al.Evaluation of three new hydrocolloid dressings: retention of dressing integrity and biodegradability of absorbent components attenuate inflammation.J Biomed Mater Res.1994;28:10,1165–1173. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
60 Sussman,G.Management of the wound environment with dressings and topical agents. In:Sussman,C.Bates-Jensen,B.(eds).Wound Care: A Collaborative Practice Manual for Health Professional (3rd edn).lippincott Williams & Wilkins,2001. Google Scholar
61 Govil,S.K.,Flynn,A.J.,Flynn,G.L.et al.Relationship of hairless mouse skin surface temperature to wound severity and maturation time.skin Pharmacol Appl skin Physiol.2003;16:5,313–323. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
62 Hayward,P.G.,Morrison,W.A.Current concepts in wound dressings.Aust Prescr.1996;19:11–13. Crossref, Google Scholar
63 Jandera,V.,Hudson,D.A.,de Wet,P.M.et al.Cooling the burn wound: evaluation of different modalities.Burns.2000;26:3,265–270. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
64 Coats,T.J.,Edwards,C.,Newton,R.et al.2002. The effect of gel burns dressings on skin temperature.Emerg Med.2002;19:224–225. Crossref, Google Scholar
65 Martineau,L.,Shek,P.N.Evaluation of a bi-layer wound dressing for burn care. I. Cooling and wound healing properties.Burns.2006;32:1,70–76. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
66 Sawada,Y.,Urushidate,S.,Yotsuyanagi,T.et al.Is prolonged and excessive cooling of a scalded wound effective? Burns. 1997; 23: 1, 55–58. Google Scholar
67 Peterson,M.E.,Daniel,R.M.,Danson,M.J.et al.The dependence of enzyme activity on temperature: determination and validation of parameters.Biochem J.2007;402:2,331–337. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
68 Fujita,J.Cold shock response in mammalian cells.J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol.1999;1:2,243–255. Medline, Google Scholar
69 Cullen,B.,Smith,R.,McCulloch,E.et al.Mechanism of action of PROMOGRAN, a protease modulating matrix, for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.Wound Repair Regen.2002;10:1,16–25. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
70 Walker, M., Bowler, P.G., Cochrane, C.A.In vitrostudies to show sequestration of matrix metalloproteinases by silver-containing wound care products. ostomy Wound Manage. 2007; 53: 9, 18–25. Medline, Google Scholar
71 Cooper,D.M.,Yu,E.Z.,Hennessey,P.et al.Determination of endogenous cytokines in chronic wounds.Ann Surg.1994;219:6,688–691. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
72 Achterberg,V.,Meyer-Ingold,W.Hydroactive dressings and serum proteins: anin vitrostudy.J Wound Care.1996;5:2,79–82. Link, Google Scholar
73 Edwards,J.V.,Howley,P.S.Human neutrophil elastase and collagenase sequestration with phosphorylated cotton wound dressings.J Biomed Mater Res A.2007;83:2,446–454. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
74 Edwards, J.V., Bopp, A.F., Batiste, s. Inhibition of elastase by a synthetic cotton-bound serine protease inhibitor:in vitrokinetics and inhibitor release. Wound Repair Regen. 1999; 7: 2, 106–118. Google Scholar
75 Edwards,J.V.,Yager,D.R.,Cohen,I.K.et al.Modified cotton gauze dressings that selectively absorb neutrophil elastase activity in solution.Wound Repair Regen.2001;9:1,50–58. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
76 Hoekstra,M.J.,Hermans,M.H.,Richters,C.D.et al.A histological comparison of acute inflammatory responses with a hydrofibre or tulle gauze dressing.J Wound Care.2002;11:3,113–117. Link, Google Scholar
77 Richters,C.D.,du Pont,J.S.,Mayen,I.et al.Effects of a Hydrofiber dressing on inflammatory cells in rat partial-thickness wounds.Wounds.2004;16:2,63–70. Google Scholar
78 Rosdy, M., Clauss, l.C. Cytotoxicity testing of wound dressings using normal human keratinocytes in culture. J Biomed Mater Res. 1990; 24: 3, 363–377. Google Scholar
79 Kramer,S.A.Effect of povidone-iodine on wound healing: a review.J Vasc Nurs.1999;17:1,17–23. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
80 Park,M.V.,Neigh,A.M.,Vermeulen,J.P.et al.The effect of particle size on the cytotoxicity, inflammation, developmental toxicity and genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles.Biomaterials.2011;32:36,9810–9817. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
81 Wilkinson, L.J., White, R.J., Chipman, J.K. silver and nanoparticles of silver in wound dressings: a review of efficacy and safety. J Wound Care. 2011; 20: 11, 543–549. Google Scholar
82 Eming,S.A.,Krieg,T.,Davidson,J.M.Inflammation in wound repair: molecular and cellular mechanisms.J Invest Dermatol.2007;127:3,514–525. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
83 Rolstad,B.S.,ovington,L.G.,Harris,A.Principles of wound management. In:Bryant,R.A.(ed).Acute and Chronic Wounds, nursing Management (2nd edn).Mosby,2000. Google Scholar
84 Chen,W.Y.,Rogers,A.S.,Lydon,M.J.Characterization of biologic properties of wound fluid collected during early stages of wound healing.J Invest Dermatol.1992;99:5,559–561. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
85 Rushton, I. understanding the role of proteases and pH in wound healing. Nurs stand. 2007; 21: 32, 68–72. Google Scholar
86 Grange-Prunier,A.,Couilliet,D.,Grange,F.,Guillaume,J.C.Allergic contact dermatitis to the Comfeel hydrocolloid dressing. Ann Dermatol venereol. 2002; 129: 5 Pt 1, 725–757. Google Scholar
87 Sasseville,D.,Tennstedt,D.,Lachapelle,J.M.Allergic contact dermatitis from hydrocolloid dressings.Am J Contact Dermat.1997;8:4,236–238. Medline, Google Scholar
88 Saap,L.,Fahim,S.,Arsenault,E.et al.Contact sensitivity in patients with leg ulcerations: a North American study.Arch Dermatol.2004;140:10,1241–1246. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
89 Davies,P.,Rippon,M.Evidence review: the clinical benefits of Safetac technology in wound care. J Wound Care. 2008; 17: 11 (Suppl.), 1–32. Google Scholar
90 Jones,V.When and how to use adhesive film dressings. Nurs times. 2000; 96: 14 (Suppl.), 3–4. Google Scholar
91 Fletcher J. Using film dressings. Nurs times. 2003; 99: 25, 57. Google Scholar
92 Jones,V.,Grey,J.E.,Harding,K.G.Wound dressings.BMJ.2006;332:777–780. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
93 Ousey,K.,Cook,L.,Young,T.et al.Hydrocolloids in practice.Wounds UK.2012;8:1,1–6. Google Scholar
94 Ågren,M.S.Four alginate dressings in the treatment of partial thickness wounds: a comparative experimental study.Br J Plast surg.1996;49:2,129–134. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
95 Walker,M.,Parsons,D.Hydrofiber technology: its role in exudate management.Wounds UK.2010;6:2,31–38. Google Scholar
96 Maume,S.,Van De Looverbosch,D.,Heyman,H.et al.A study to compare a new self-adherent soft silicone dressing with a self-adherent polymer dressing in stage II pressure ulcers.Ostomy Wound Manage.2003;49:9,44–51. Medline, Google Scholar

1 August 2012Volume 21Issue 8

ISSN (print): 0969-0700
ISSN (online): 2052-2916

Metrics

Downloaded 75 times

History

Published online 16 August 2013

Published in print 1 August 2012

Information

Keywords

PDF download