This study aimed to compare the impact of virtual reality game therapy and task-specific neurodevelopmental training on the motor recovery of upper limb and trunk control, as well as physical function, in people who have had a stroke.

Methods

This randomised, assessor-blinded clinical trial was conducted with 34 patients with post-stroke duration of 135 ± 23 days. Patients with first-onset cortical stroke aged 40–60 years, Mini-Mental State Examination score >20, ability to complete a nine-hole peg test within 120 seconds, ability to lift the affected arm at shoulder level and independent standing were included. Patients were excluded if they had unilateral neglect and musculoskeletal injuries of the affected limb in the past 2 months. Outcome measures used were the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Scale, Action Research Arm Test, Trunk Impairment Scale and Stroke Impact Scale-16. The virtual reality game therapy group performed interactive table tennis, boxing and discus throwing games. The neurodevelopmental treatment group underwent task-specific movements of the upper limb in sitting and standing. All patients performed 45 minutes of treatment, 5 days a week for 4 weeks.

Results

Both groups showed improvements in all measures after training (P<0.05). There was a between-group difference of 3.47 points in Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Scale in favour of the virtual reality game therapy.

Conclusions

Both treatment regimens resulted in equal improvements in hand dexterity and trunk control after stroke. Virtual reality game therapy improved the upper limb motor recovery of stroke survivors to a greater extent than neurodevelopmental treatment.

References

Arya KN, Verma R, Garg RK. Estimating the minimal clinically important difference of an upper extremity recovery measure in subacute stroke patients. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18(suppl 1):599–610. https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr18s01-599 Crossref, Google Scholar
Cott CA, Vaughan-Graham J, Brunton K. When will the evidence catch up with clinical practice? Physiother Can. 2011;63(3):387–390. https://doi.org/10.3138/physio.63.3.387 Crossref, Google Scholar
Dias P, Silva R, Amorim P et al.. Using virtual reality to increase motivation in poststroke rehabilitation. IEEE Comput Graph Appl. 2019;39(1):67–70. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2018.2875630 Crossref, Google Scholar
Díaz-Arribas MJ, Martín-Casas P, Cano-de-la-Cuerda R, Plaza-Manzano G. Effectiveness of the Bobath concept in the treatment of stroke: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(12):1636–1649. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1590865 Crossref, Google Scholar
Flynn S, Palma P, Bender A. Feasibility of using the Sony PlayStation 2 gaming platform for an individual poststroke: a case report. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007;31(4):180–189. https://doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0b013e31815d00d5 Crossref, Google Scholar
French B, Thomas LH, Leathley MJ et al.. Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;4:1–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006073.pub3 Google Scholar
Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13–31 Google Scholar
Fulk GD, Ludwig M, Dunning K et al.. How much change in the Stroke Impact Scale-16 is important to people who have experienced a stroke? Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010;17(6):477–483. https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr1706-477 Crossref, Google Scholar
Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16(3):232–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/154596802401105171 Crossref, Google Scholar
Hendricks HT, Limbeek J, Geurts AC, Zwarts MJ. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(11):1629–1637. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.35473 Crossref, Google Scholar
Holden MK. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: review. Cyber Psychol Behav. 2005;8(3):187–211. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2005.8.187 Crossref, Google Scholar
Howle JM, Neuro-Developmental Treatment Association. Neuro-developmental treatment approach: theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice. Augusta (GA): Neuro-Developmental Treatment Association; 2002 Google Scholar
Hsieh CL, Hsueh IP, Chiang FM, Lin PH. Inter-rater reliability and validity of the Action Research arm test in stroke patients. Age Ageing. 1998;27(2):107–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/27.2.107 Crossref, Google Scholar
Karthikbabu S, Chakrapani M, Ganesan S, Ellajosyula R, Solomon JM. Efficacy of trunk regimes on balance, mobility, physical function, and community reintegration in chronic stroke: a parallel-group randomized trial. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;27(4):1003–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.11.003 Crossref, Google Scholar
Kılınç M, Avcu F, Onursal O et al.. The effects of Bobath-based trunk exercises on trunk control, functional capacity, balance, and gait: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016;23(1):50–58. https://doi.org/10.1179/1945511915Y.0000000011 Crossref, Google Scholar
Kollen BJ, Lennon S, Lyons B et al.. The effectiveness of the Bobath concept in stroke rehabilitation: what is the evidence? Stroke. 2009;40(4):89–97. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.533828 Crossref, Google Scholar
Krakauer JW. Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol. 2006;19:84–90. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wco.0000200544.29915.cc Crossref, Google Scholar
Ku J, Mraz R, Baker N et al.. A data glove with tactile feedback for fMRI of virtual reality experiments. Cyber Psychol Behav. 2003;6(5):497–508. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493103769710523 Crossref, Google Scholar
Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22(3-5):281–299 Google Scholar
Langhammer B, Stanghelle JK. Bobath or motor relearning programme? A comparison of two different approaches of physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 2000;14(4):361–369. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215500cr338oa Crossref, Google Scholar
Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(8):741–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70150-4 Crossref, Google Scholar
Laver KE, George S, Thomas S, Deutsch JE, Crotty M. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. an abridged version of Cochrane review. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015;51(4):497–506 Google Scholar
Laver KE, Lange B, George S et al.. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;11. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008349.pub4 Google Scholar
Lennon S, Ashburn A. The Bobath concept in stroke rehabilitation: a focus group study of the experienced physiotherapists' perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2000;22(15):665–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/096382800445461 Crossref, Google Scholar
Lennon S, Baxter D, Ashburn A. Physiotherapy based on the Bobath concept in stroke rehabilitation: a survey within the UK. Disabil Rehabil. 2001;23(6):254–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/096382801750110892 Crossref, Google Scholar
Lin K-C, Fu T, Wu C-y et al.. Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the Stroke Impact Scale in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(5):486–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968309356295 Crossref, Google Scholar
Mikołajewska E. Value of NDT-Bobath method in post-stroke hand function rehabilitation. Med Sci Tech. 2011;52(3-4):109–113 Google Scholar
Nomikos PA, Spence N, Alshehri MA. Test-retest reliability of physiotherapists using the Action Research arm test in chronic stroke. J Phys Ther Sci. 2018;30(10):1271–1277. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.30.1271 Crossref, Google Scholar
Page SJ, Gater DR, Bach-y-Rita P. Reconsidering the motor recovery plateau in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(8):1377–1381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2003.12.031 Crossref, Google Scholar
Page SJ, Levine P, Hade E. Psychometric properties and administration of the wrist/hand subscales of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment in minimally impairment upper extremity hemiparesis in stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(12):2373–2376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.06.017 Crossref, Google Scholar
Pollock A, Farmer SE, Brady MC et al.. Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;12(11):1–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010820.pub2 Google Scholar
Raine S. Defining the Bobath concept using the Delphi technique. Physiother Res Int. 2006;11(1):4–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.35 Crossref, Google Scholar
Rensink M, Schuurmans M, Lindeman E, Hafsteinsdottir T. Task-oriented training in rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(4):737–754. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04925.x Crossref, Google Scholar
Saposnik G, Teasell R, Mamdani M et al.. Effectiveness of virtual reality using Wii gaming technology in stroke rehabilitation: a pilot randomized clinical trial and proof of principle. Stroke. 2010;41(7):1477–1484. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.584979 Crossref, Google Scholar
Sin H, Lee G. Additional virtual reality training using Xbox Kinect in stroke survivors with hemiplegia. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;92(10):871–880. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e3182a38e40 Crossref, Google Scholar
Singer B, Garcia-Vega J. The Fugl-Meyer upper extremity scale. J Physiother. 2017;63(1):53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2016.08.010 Crossref, Google Scholar
Todorov E, Shadmehr R, Bizzi E. Augmented feedback presented in a virtual environment accelerates learning of a difficult motor task. J Mot Behav. 1997;29(2):147–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222899709600829 Crossref, Google Scholar
Van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ et al.. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blinded randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 1999;30(11):2369–2375. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.30.11.2369 Crossref, Google Scholar
Van der Lee JH, Beckerman H, Lankhorst G, Bouter LM. The responsiveness of the Action Research Arm test and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale in chronic stroke patients. J Rehabil Med. 2001;33(3):110–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/165019701750165916 Crossref, Google Scholar
Van Wijck FM, Pandyan AD, Johnson GR, Barnes MP. Assessing motor deficits in neurological rehabilitation: patterns of instrument usage. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2001;15(1):23–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/154596830101500104 Crossref, Google Scholar
Veerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R et al.. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e87987. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087987 Crossref, Google Scholar
Veličkovíć TD. Basic principles of the neurodevelopmental treatment (NDT): Bobath. Paediatria Croatica, Suppl. 2002;46(1):163–168 Google Scholar
Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, Mertin J et al.. The Trunk Impairment Scale: a new tool to measure motor impairment of the trunk after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(3):326–334. https://doi.org/10.1191/026 9215504cr733oa Crossref, Google Scholar
Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, Feys H et al.. Discriminant ability of the Trunk Impairment Scale: a comparison between stroke patients and healthy individuals. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(17):1023–1028. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280500052872 Crossref, Google Scholar
Wang R-Y, Chen H-I, Chen C-Y, Yang Y-R. Efficacy of Bobath versus orthopaedic approach on impairment and function at different motor recovery stages after stroke: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19(2):155–164. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215505cr850oa Crossref, Google Scholar
Winstein CJ. Knowledge of results and motor learning implications for physical therapy. Phys Ther. 1991;71(2):140–149. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/71.2.140 Crossref, Google Scholar
Yavuzer G, Senel A, Atay MB, Stam HJ. “PlayStation eyetoy games” improve upper extremity-related motor functioning in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008;44(3):237–244 Google Scholar
Yozbatiran N, Der-Yeghiaian L, Cramer SC. A standardized approach to performing the Action Research Arm Test. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(1):78–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968307305353 Crossref, Google Scholar

International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation

2 August 2020Volume 27Issue 8

ISSN (online): 1759-779X

Metrics

Downloaded 21 times

History

Received 29 May 2019

Accepted 14 February 2020

Published online 2 September 2020

Published in print 2 August 2020

Information

Keywords

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to study participants for their voluntary contribution. The authors sincerely appreciate the efforts and time provided by the editor, reviewers and production team of the International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation.

PDF download