This website is intended for healthcare professionals

Nurses’ views on using the Liverpool Care Pathway in an acute hospital setting

    Abstract

    The Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) is one of three major recent UK initiatives to improve the care of people dying with malignant and non-malignant disease. This focus group research aimed to explore nurses’ perceptions of using the LCP in an acute hospital setting, their perceptions of its impact on patient care, and their confidence in care at the end of life, as well as to generate new ideas among peers. Six themes were identified: use of the LCP as a care tool; improved confidence, training, and support; the nursing–medical relationship; dying in hospital; and end-of-life issues. The nurses reported that the LCP has increased their confidence and resulted in improved patient care. Exploring the effect of the LCP on patient care may provide valuable data that may inform how the LCP is integrated into practice in the future.

    References

    • Bowling A (2001) Research Methods in Health. Investigating Health and Health Services. Oxford University Press, Poland Google Scholar
    • Department of Health (2000) The NHS Cancer Plan: a plan for investment, a plan for reform. Department of Health Google Scholar
    • Department of Health (2003) Building on the best: choice, responsiveness and equity in the NHS. Department of Health, London Google Scholar
    • Department of Health (2008) End of Life Care Strategy-promoting high quality care for all adults at the end of life. Department of Health, London Google Scholar
    • Duffy A, Woodland C (2006) Introducing the Liverpool Care Pathway into nursing homes. Nurs Older People 18(9): 33–6 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Ellershaw J, Ward C (2003) Care of the dying patient: the last hours or days of life. BMJ 326(7379): 30–4 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Ellershaw J, Wilkinson S (2003) Care of The Dying, a Pathway to Excellence. Oxford University Press, Great Britain CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Ellershaw J (2007) Care of the dying: what a difference an LCP makes. Palliat Med 21(5): 365–8 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Gambles M, Stirzaker S, Jack BA, Ellershaw JE (2006) The Liverpool Care Pathway in hospices: an exploratory study of doctor and nurse perceptions. Int J Palliat Nurs 12(9): 414–21 LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Hudson P (2003) Focus group interviews: a guide for palliative care researchers and clinicians. Int J Palliat Nurs 9(5): 202–7 LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Jack BA, Gambles M, Murphy D, Ellershaw JE (2003) Nurses’ perceptions of the Liverpool Care Pathway for the dying patient in the acute hospital setting. Int J Palliat Nurs 9(9): 375–381 LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Kreuger RA, Casey MA (2000) Focus Groups. A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 3rd edn. SAGE, USA Google Scholar
    • Marie Curie Palliative Care Institute Liverpool and Royal College of Physicians (2008/2009) National Care of the Dying Audit – Hospitals (NCDAH) Round 2, Generic Report 2008/2009. Marie Curie Palliative Care Institute Liverpool Google Scholar
    • McNicholl MP et al. (2006) Using the Liverpool Care Pathway for a dying patient. Nurs Standard 20(38): 46–50 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Mellor F, Foley T, Connolly M, Mercer V, Spanswick M (2004) Role of a clinical facilitator in introducing an integrated care pathway for the care of the dying. Int J Palliat Nurs 10(10): 497–501 LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Mirando S, Davies PD, Lipp A (2005) Introducing an integrated care pathway for the last days of life. Palliat Med 19(1): 33–9 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • National End of Life Care Programme (2004) Preferred Priorities for Care. www.endofifecareforadults.nhs.uk/as-sets/downloads/PPC_document_v22_rev_20111.pdf (accessed 27 April 2011) Google Scholar
    • National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2004) Guidance on Cancer Services: Improving Supportive and Palliative Care for Adults with Cancer. National Institute for Clinical Excellence Google Scholar
    • Parish K, Glaetzer K, Grbich C, Hammond L, Hegarty M, McHugh A (2006) Dying for attention: palliative care in the acute setting. Aust J Adv Nurs 24(2): 21–5 Google Scholar
    • Perkins P, Barclay S, Booth S (2007) What are patients’ priorities for palliative care research? Focus group study. Palliat Med 21(3): 219–25 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Thompson G, McClement S, Daeninck P (2006) Nurses’ perceptions of quality end-of-life care on an acute medical ward. J Adv Nurs 53(2): 169–77 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Veerbeek L, van Zulyen L, Gambles M et al. (2006) Audit of the Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying Patient in a Dutch cancer hospital. J Palliat Care 22(4): 305–8 MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Walker R, Reid S (2010) The Liverpool Care Pathway in intensive care: an exploratory study of doctor and nurse perceptions. Int J Palliat Nurs 16(6): 267–73 LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Watson J, Hockley J, Dewar B (2006) Barriers to implementing an integrated care pathway for the last days of life in nursing homes. Int J Palliat Nurs 12(5): 234–40 LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Willard C, Luker K (2006) Challenges to end of life care in the acute hospital setting. Palliat Med 20(6): 611–5 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

    This website is intended for healthcare professionals