The impact of peer-led simulations on student nurses

References

• Alaszewski A, Burgess A (2007) Risk, time and reason. Health, Risk & Society, 9(4): 349–58 Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alinier G, Hunt B, Gordon R, Harwood C (2006) Effectiveness of intermediate-fidelity simulation training technology in undergraduate nursing education. J Adv Nurs 54(3): 359–69 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• Alverson DC, Saiki SMJ, Jacobs J, Saland L, Keep MF, Norenberg J (2004) Distributed interactive virtual environments for collaborative experiential learning and training independent of distance over Internet2. Stud Health Technol Inform 98: 7–12 Medline, Google Scholar
• Bambini D, Washburn J, Perkins R (2009) Outcomes of clinical simulation for novice nursing students: Communication, confidence, clinical judgment. Nurs Educ Perspect 30(2): 79–82 Medline, Google Scholar
• Bandura A (2004) Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav 31(2): 143–64 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• Biggs J (1993) What do inventories of students' learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. Br J Educ Psychol 63(1): 3–19 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• Bush H (2009) Practice makes perfect. Michigan medical school uses simulation center training to produce more competent, confident students. Hosp Health Netw 83(3): 28–30 Google Scholar
• Cantrell MA (2008) The importance of debriefing in clinical simulations. Clinical Simulation in Nursing 4(2): e19–e23 Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cioffi J (2001) Clinical simulations: Development & Validation. Nurse Educ Today 21(6): 477–86 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• Dougherty L, Lister S (2011). The Royal Marsden Hospital Manual of Clinical Nursing Procedures. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford Google Scholar
• Fanning RM, Gaba DM (2007) The role of debriefing in simulation–based learning. Simul Healthc 2(2): 115–25 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• Gordon J, Oriol N, Cooper J (2004) Bringing good teaching cases ‘to life’: a simulator-based medical education service. Acad Med 79(1): 23–7 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• Gormley G (2011) Summative OSCEs in undergraduate medical education. Ulster Med J 80(3): 127–32 Medline, Google Scholar
• Haskvitz IM, Koop EC (2004) Students struggling in clinical? A new role for the patient simulator. J Nurs Educ 43(4): 181–4 Medline, Google Scholar
• Henneman EA, Cunningham H, Roche JP, Curnin M (2007) Human patient simulation: Teaching students to provide safe care. Nurse Educ 32(5): 212–7 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Gordon DL, Scalese, RJ (2005) Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach 27(1): 10–28 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• Jeffries PR, Rizzolo MA (2006) Designing and implementing models for the innovative use of simulation to teach nursing care of ill adults and children: A national, multi-site, multi-method study. National League for Nursing, New York Google Scholar
• Jefferies PR (2005) A framework for designing, implementing, and evaluating simulations used as a teaching strategies in nursing. Nurs Educ Perspect 26(2): 96–103 Medline, Google Scholar
• Khan P, O'Rourke K (2005) ‘Understanding enquiry-based learning’. In: Barrett TMacLabhrainn IFallon H, eds. Handbook of enquiry and problem based learning. CELT, Galway. http://tinyurl.com/mttzqjd (accessed 17 March 2014) Google Scholar
• Kneebone RL, Scott W, Darzi A, Horrocks M (2004) Simulation and clinical practice: strengthening the relationship. Med Educ 38(10): 1095–1103 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• Knowles MS (1975) Self-Directed Learning. A guide for learners and teachers. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall/Cambridge Google Scholar
• Knowles MS, Holton III EF, Swanson R (2005) The adult learner: the definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. Elsevier. Google Scholar
• Lasater K (2007) Clinical judgment development: Using simulation to create an assessment rubric. J Nurs Educ 46(11): 496–503 Medline, Google Scholar
• Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Lederman Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lederman LC (1992) Debriefing: Toward a systematic assessment of theory and practice. Simulation & Gaming 23(2): 145–60 Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lekalakala-Mokgele E (2010) Facilitation in problem-based learning: Experiencing the locus of control. Nurse Educ Today 30(7): 638–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.12.017 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• Loyens S, Magda J, Rikers R (2008) Self-Directed Learning in Problem-Based Learning and its Relationships with Self-Regulated Learning. Educ Psychol Rev 20(4): 411. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9082-7 Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mandler G, Sarason SB (1952) A study of anxiety and learning. J Abnorm Psychol. 47(2): 166–73 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• McCaughey C, Traynor MK (2010) The role of simulation in nurse education. Nurse Educ Today 30(8): 827–32 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• Miller GE (1990) The assessment of clinical skills, competence and performance. Acad Med 65(9 Suppl): 563–7 Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meechan R, Jones H, Valler-Jones T (2011) Students' perspectives on skills acquisition and confidence. Br J Nurs 20(7): 445–50 Link, Google Scholar
• Moore J (2009) An exploration of lecturer as facilitator within the context of problem-based learning. Nurse Educ Today 29(2): 150–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2008.08.004 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• Papp I, Markkanen M, von Bonsdorff M (2003) Clinical environment as a learning environment: student nurses' perceptions concerning clinical learning experiences. Nurse Educ Today 23(4): 262–8 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• Peters VAM, Vissers GAN (2004) A simple classification model for debriefing simulation games. Simulation Gaming 35(1): 70–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878103253719 Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rall M, Manser T, Howard SK (2000) Key elements of debriefing for simulator training. Eur J Anaesthesiol 17(8): 516–7 Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reilly A, Spratt C (2007) The perceptions of undergraduate student nurses of high-fidelity simulation-based learning: A case report from the University of Tasmania. Nurse Educ Today 27(6): 542–50 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• Resuscitation Council UK (2010) Resuscitation Guidelines 2010. http://tinyurl.com/3ram3db (accessed 18 March 2012) Google Scholar
• Rudolph JW, Simon R, Dufresne RL, Raemer DB (2006) There's no such thing as “nonjudgmental” debriefing: a theory and method for debriefing with good judgment. Simul Healthc 1(1): 49–55 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• Savoldelli GL, Naik VN, Park J, Joo HS, Chow R, Hamstra SJ (2006) Value of debriefing during simulated crisis management: oral versus video-assisted oral feedback. Anesthesiology 105(2): 279–85 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• Schroedl, CJ, Corbridge, TC, Cohen ERet al. (2012) Use of simulation-based education to improve resident learning and patient care in the medical intensive care unit: A randomized trial. J Crit Care 27(2): 219.e7–219.e13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.08.006 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• Shinnick M, Woo M, Horwich T, Steadman R (2011) Debriefing: The Most Important Component in Simulation? Clinical Simulation in Nursing 7(3): e105–e111. http://tinyurl.com/mah4say (accessed 17 March 2014) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vygotsky LS (1978) Mind in society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
• Zendejas B, Brydges R, Wang AT, Cook DA (2013) Patient Outcomes in Simulation-Based Medical Education: A Systematic Review. J Gen Intern Med. 28(8): 1078–89 doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2264-5 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar