Legal
The new EU healthcare rights directive: greater uniformity?
Jean V McHale
Published Online:16 Aug 2013https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2011.20.7.442
Abstract
On 9th March 2011 the new EU Directive on Patients’ Rights in Cross-border Healthcare was adopted. This article explores its implications for the delivery of health care in the UK. It notes that the final version of the Directive provides much greater discretion to member states to control access to resources than was suggested in early drafts of the Directive. It explores the situations in which care can be subject to prior authorization and suggests that perhaps the greatest long-term impact of the Directive will not be in patient mobility as such but rather in relation to its impact on broader standard setting across the EU.
References
Abdon Vanbraekel and others v Alliance nationale des mutualities chretiennes (2001) ECJ, Case C-368/98 ECR-I-5363. Google Scholar- (2007) Seeking Healthcare Elsewhere. Cambridge Law Journal 66 Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities (2006) Communication from the Commission, Consultation Regarding Community action on Health Services. CEC, Brussels Google ScholarCommission of the European Communities (2008) Proposal for a Directive on the application of patients’ rights in cross border healthcare 414 final. http://tinyurl.com/4vbzn4y (Accessed 30 March 2011) Google Scholar- (2007) The effect of Mrs Watts Trip to France on the National Health Service. Kings Law Journal 160 Google Scholar
Department of Health (2007a) Going to Another European Country to Get Treatment. DH, London. http://tinyurl.com/6keyzwy (Accessed 30 March 2011) Google ScholarDepartment of Health (2007b) Patient mobility: advice to local healthcare commissioners on handling requests for hospital care in other European Countries following the ECJ judgement in the Watts case. (Gateway reference 8010). DH, London Google ScholarEuropean Commission (September 2006) Communication from the Commission: Consultation regarding Community action on health services. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, SEC (2006) 1195. Google ScholarEuropean Commission (2008) Proposal for a Directive on the application of patients’ rights in cross border healthcare. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels COM (2008) 414 final. Google ScholarEuropean Union (2011) Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the application of patients rights in cross-border healthcare European Union (2008) ConsolidatedVersion of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Article 57 (ex Article 50 EC) further provides that: ‘Services shall be considered to be ‘services’ within the meaning of the Treaties where they are normally provided for remuneration...; ‘Services’ shall in particular include. (d) Activities of the professions.’ Official Journal of the European Union C115/47 Google Scholar- Geraets-Smits v Stchting Ziekenfonds VGZ and Peerbooms v. Stichting CZ Groep Zorgverzekerigen (2001) ECJ, Case C-157/99 ECR I- 5473 Google Scholar
- Inizan v Caisse primarie d’ Assurance Maladie des Hauts de Seine (2003) ECJ, Case C-56/01 ECR-I. Google Scholar
- Kohll (1998) ECJ, Case C-158/96 ECR-I-1935 Google Scholar
- (2007) The Right to Medical Treatment in EU law’ (2007) Medical Law Review 99 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
Muller-Faure and van Riet (2003) ECJ, Case C- 385/99 ECR I -4509. Google Scholar- (2005) Who Shall We Treat? Oxford University Press: 244 Google Scholar
- (2001) Comparative Health law and the harmonisation of patients’ rights in Europe. European Journal of Health Law 8: 317. Crossref, Google Scholar
- R (on the application of Watts) v. Bedford Primary Care Trust, Secretary of State for Health (2006) ECJ, Case C-372/04 ECR I-4325 Google Scholar
